dog: attack dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.70
, pet
Weight: 0.69
Siblings beagle
Weight: 0.83
, small dog
Weight: 0.81
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.81
, cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.80
, dachshund
Weight: 0.77

Related properties

Property Similarity
attack dogs 1.00
attack other dogs 0.98
attack dog 0.97
attack big dogs 0.96
attack little dogs 0.95
attack certain dogs 0.95
attack large dogs 0.95
attack hurt dogs 0.93
attack dog having 0.93
attack smaller dogs 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, attack dogs)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(small dog, attack big dogs)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, attack dogs)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(small dog, attack large dogs)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, attack dogs)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(small dog, attack dogs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, attack dogs)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(small dog, attack dogs)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(small dog, attack dogs)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, attack dogs)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(small dog, attack big dogs)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(small dog, attack big dogs)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, attack dogs)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(small dog, attack large dogs)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(small dog, attack large dogs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, attack dogs)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(dog, attack dogs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(dog, attack dogs)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, attack dogs)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, attack dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, attack dogs)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, attack dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, attack dogs)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(small dog, attack large dogs)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, attack dogs)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(small dog, attack big dogs)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, attack dogs)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(small dog, attack dogs)