dog: be used to pet

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pet food
Weight: 0.73
, wild animal
Weight: 0.71
, mammal
Weight: 0.70
, pet
Weight: 0.69
Siblings beagle
Weight: 0.83
, small dog
Weight: 0.81
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.81
, cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.80
, police dog
Weight: 0.76

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to pet 1.00
be at pet store 0.94
become pet 0.93
be keep as pet 0.92
be at pet shop 0.92
be great pet 0.91
eat pet food 0.91
be buy at pet store 0.90
be use as pet and companion 0.90
be make into pet for human 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(pet, be used to pet)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(dog, be used to pet)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(pet food, be at pet store)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(dog, be used to pet)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(dog, be used to pet)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(pet, be used to pet)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(dog, be used to pet)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(pet food, be at pet store)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(dog, be used to pet)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pet food, be at pet store)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(dog, be used to pet)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pet, be used to pet)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(dog, be used to pet)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(small dog, be at pet store)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(dog, be used to pet)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(small dog, be at pet shop)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(pet, be used to pet)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(dog, be used to pet)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(dog, be used to pet)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(pet food, be at pet store)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(dog, be used to pet)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(dog, be used to pet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(dog, be used to pet)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(small dog, be at pet store)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(small dog, be at pet store)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(dog, be used to pet)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(small dog, be at pet shop)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(small dog, be at pet shop)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(dog, be used to pet)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(dog, be used to pet)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(dog, be used to pet)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(dog, be keep as pet)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(dog, be used to pet)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(dog, be keep as pet)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(dog, be used to pet)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(dog, be keep as pet)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(dog, be used to pet)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(dog, be keep as pet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(dog, be used to pet)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(dog, be used to pet)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(dog, be used to pet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(dog, be used to pet)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(dog, be used to pet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(dog, be used to pet)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(pet, be used to pet)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(dog, be used to pet)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(pet food, be at pet store)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(dog, be used to pet)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(small dog, be at pet shop)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(dog, be used to pet)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(small dog, be at pet store)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(dog, be used to pet)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(pet, be used to pet)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(dog, be used to pet)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(pet food, be at pet store)