dog: has physical part ears

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.70
, pet
Weight: 0.69
Siblings beagle
Weight: 0.83
, small dog
Weight: 0.81
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.81
, cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.80
, dachshund
Weight: 0.77

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part ears 1.00
have long ears 0.90
have big ears 0.89
move ears 0.87
has physical part mouths 0.86
has physical part nose 0.86
put back ears 0.85
control ears 0.85
have soft ears 0.84
has physical part noses 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has physical part ears)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, have big ears)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, have long ears)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(beagle, has physical part ears)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, have big ears)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, have long ears)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(beagle, have big ears)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(beagle, have long ears)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, has physical part ears)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(beagle, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(beagle, has physical part ears)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(cocker spaniel, have long ears)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, have long ears)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(beagle, have long ears)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(beagle, have long ears)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(dachshund, have long ears)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(dachshund, have long ears)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(cocker spaniel, have big ears)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, have big ears)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(dachshund, have big ears)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(dachshund, have big ears)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(beagle, have big ears)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(beagle, have big ears)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(dog, has physical part ears)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(dog, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, have big ears)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, have big ears)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(dog, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(dog, have big ears)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(dog, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, have big ears)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(dog, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has physical part nose)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, has physical part nose)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(dog, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(dog, has physical part nose)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(dog, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part nose)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(dog, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part ears)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has physical part ears)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, has physical part ears)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, have long ears)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, have big ears)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(beagle, has physical part ears)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(dachshund, have big ears)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(dachshund, have long ears)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(beagle, have big ears)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(beagle, have long ears)