dog: has state pets

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.70
, pet
Weight: 0.69
Siblings beagle
Weight: 0.83
, small dog
Weight: 0.81
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.81
, cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.80
, dachshund
Weight: 0.77

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state pets 1.00
is popular pets 0.92
is house pets 0.91
be house pets 0.91
has state pet 0.91
is most popular pets 0.89
is loving pets 0.87
is main pets 0.87
is pet 0.87
being pet 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(beagle, has state pets)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, has state pets)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has state pets)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(beagle, has state pet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, has state pets)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(dachshund, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(dachshund, has state pets)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(beagle, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(beagle, has state pets)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(beagle, has state pet)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(beagle, has state pet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has state pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(dog, has state pets)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(dog, has state pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(dog, has state pet)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has state pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, has state pet)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(dog, has state pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has state pet)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(dog, has state pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has state pet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(dog, has state pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has state pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has state pets)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has state pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has state pets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(beagle, has state pets)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(dachshund, has state pets)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, has state pets)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(beagle, has state pet)