dollar: be at name of store

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents currency
Weight: 0.64
, dollar bill
Weight: 0.62
, resource
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.56
Siblings euro
Weight: 0.61
, commodity
Weight: 0.33
, kiwi
Weight: 0.32
, stock
Weight: 0.32
, penny
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at name of store 1.00
be buy at store 0.79
be at name of stor 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(thing, be buy at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(dollar, be at name of store)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(dollar, be at name of store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(thing, be buy at store)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(dollar, be at name of store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(thing, be buy at store)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(thing, be buy at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(dollar, be at name of store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(dollar, be at name of store)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(dollar, be at name of store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(dollar, be at name of store)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(dollar, be at name of store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(dollar, be at name of stor)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(dollar, be at name of store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(dollar, be at name of stor)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(dollar, be at name of store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(dollar, be at name of stor)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(dollar, be at name of store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(dollar, be at name of stor)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(dollar, be at name of store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(dollar, be at name of store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(dollar, be at name of store)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(dollar, be at name of store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(dollar, be at name of store)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(dollar, be at name of store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(thing, be buy at store)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(dollar, be at name of store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(thing, be buy at store)