domain name: be unique

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents name
Weight: 0.85
, domain
Weight: 0.76
, web site
Weight: 0.71
, address
Weight: 0.70
Siblings organization
Weight: 0.63
, dot
Weight: 0.54
, prefix
Weight: 0.36
, alias
Weight: 0.36
, username
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be unique 1.00
have unique 0.98
is different 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(domain name, be unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(username, have unique)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(domain name, be unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(username, have unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(username, have unique)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(domain name, be unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(domain name, be unique)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(domain name, be unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(domain name, have unique)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(domain name, be unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(domain name, have unique)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(domain name, be unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(domain name, have unique)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(domain name, be unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(domain name, have unique)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(domain name, be unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(domain name, is different)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(domain name, be unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(domain name, is different)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(domain name, be unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(domain name, is different)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(domain name, be unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(domain name, is different)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(domain name, be unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(domain name, be unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(domain name, be unique)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(domain name, be unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(domain name, be unique)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(domain name, be unique) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(username, have unique)