domain name: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents name
Weight: 0.85
, domain
Weight: 0.76
, web site
Weight: 0.71
, address
Weight: 0.70
Siblings organization
Weight: 0.63
, dot
Weight: 0.54
, prefix
Weight: 0.36
, alias
Weight: 0.36
, username
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
is quality 0.91
has quality use 0.88
has quality change 0.86
has quality wrong 0.85
has quality systems 0.80
has quality prices 0.78
has quality function 0.78
has quality definition 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(domain, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(domain name, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(web site, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(domain name, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(domain, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(domain name, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(domain name, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(domain, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(domain name, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(web site, is quality)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(domain name, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(domain, has quality wrong)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(domain name, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(domain, has quality wrong)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(domain name, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(domain, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(domain name, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(web site, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(domain name, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(prefix, has quality function)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(domain, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(domain name, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(domain name, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(web site, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(domain name, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(domain name, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(domain, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(domain name, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(domain name, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(domain name, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(prefix, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(prefix, has quality function)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(domain name, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(domain name, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(domain name, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(domain name, has quality prices)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(domain name, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(domain name, has quality prices)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(domain name, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(domain name, has quality definition)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(domain name, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(domain name, has quality prices)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(domain name, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(domain name, has quality definition)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(domain name, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(domain name, has quality definition)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(domain name, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(domain name, has quality prices)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(domain name, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(domain name, has quality definition)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(domain name, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(domain name, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(domain name, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(domain name, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(domain name, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(domain name, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(web site, is quality)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(domain name, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(domain, has quality wrong)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(domain name, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(domain, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(domain name, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(prefix, has quality function)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(domain name, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(domain, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(domain name, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(web site, is quality)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(domain name, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(domain, has quality wrong)