domain name: is value

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents name
Weight: 0.85
, domain
Weight: 0.76
, web site
Weight: 0.71
, address
Weight: 0.70
Siblings organization
Weight: 0.63
, dot
Weight: 0.54
, prefix
Weight: 0.36
, alias
Weight: 0.36
, username
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is value 1.00
value communication 0.85
need values 0.79
is valuation 0.78
have values 0.78
value internal communication 0.78
have core values 0.77
cost amount year 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(domain, cost amount year)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(domain name, is value)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(domain name, is value)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(domain, cost amount year)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(domain name, is value)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(domain, cost amount year)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(domain name, is value)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(organization, have core values)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(domain name, is value)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(organization, have values)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(domain, cost amount year)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(domain name, is value)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(domain name, is value)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(domain name, is value)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(organization, have values)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(organization, have values)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(domain name, is value)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(organization, have core values)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(organization, have core values)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(domain name, is value)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(domain name, is value)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(domain name, is value)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(domain name, is valuation)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(domain name, is value)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(domain name, is valuation)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(domain name, is value)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(domain name, is valuation)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(domain name, is value)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(domain name, is valuation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(domain name, is value)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(domain name, is value)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(domain name, is value)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(domain name, is value)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(domain name, is value)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(domain name, is value)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(domain, cost amount year)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(domain name, is value)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(organization, have values)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(domain name, is value)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(organization, have core values)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(domain name, is value)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(domain, cost amount year)