domain: cost amount year

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents parameter
Weight: 0.64
, web site
Weight: 0.57
, factor
Weight: 0.56
, activity
Weight: 0.55
, asset
Weight: 0.55
Siblings domain name
Weight: 0.76
, web browser
Weight: 0.34
, filename
Weight: 0.34
, web
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
cost amount year 1.00
cost money 0.88
cost more 0.87
affect amount 0.86
costs money 0.84
add to amount 0.83
add to amount in air 0.79
be recorded at cost 0.79
affect amount of rain 0.77
is value 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(asset, be recorded at cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(domain, cost amount year)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(activity, affect amount of rain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(domain, cost amount year)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(domain, cost amount year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(activity, affect amount of rain)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(domain, cost amount year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(asset, be recorded at cost)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(domain, cost amount year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(asset, be recorded at cost)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(domain, cost amount year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(activity, affect amount of rain)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(domain, cost amount year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(domain name, cost money)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(domain, cost amount year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(domain name, is value)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(asset, be recorded at cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(domain, cost amount year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(domain, cost amount year)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(activity, affect amount of rain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(domain, cost amount year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(domain, cost amount year)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(domain, cost amount year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(domain name, cost money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(domain name, cost money)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(domain, cost amount year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(domain name, is value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(domain name, is value)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(domain, cost amount year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(domain, cost amount year)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(domain, cost amount year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(domain, cost money)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(domain, cost amount year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(domain, cost more)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(domain, cost amount year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(domain, cost more)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(domain, cost amount year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(domain, cost money)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(domain, cost amount year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(domain, cost more)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(domain, cost amount year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(domain, cost money)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(domain, cost amount year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(domain, costs money)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(domain, cost amount year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(domain, costs money)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(domain, cost amount year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(domain, costs money)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(domain, cost amount year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(domain, cost more)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(domain, cost amount year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(domain, costs money)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(domain, cost amount year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(domain, cost money)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(domain, cost amount year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(domain, cost amount year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(domain, cost amount year)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(domain, cost amount year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(domain, cost amount year)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(domain, cost amount year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(activity, affect amount of rain)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(domain, cost amount year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(asset, be recorded at cost)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(domain, cost amount year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(domain name, cost money)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(domain, cost amount year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(domain name, is value)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(domain, cost amount year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(activity, affect amount of rain)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(domain, cost amount year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(asset, be recorded at cost)