domain: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents parameter
Weight: 0.64
, web site
Weight: 0.57
, factor
Weight: 0.56
, activity
Weight: 0.55
, asset
Weight: 0.55
Siblings domain name
Weight: 0.76
, web browser
Weight: 0.34
, filename
Weight: 0.34
, web
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
is quality 0.91
has quality wrong 0.85
has quality worth 0.85
has quality shit 0.79
affect water quality 0.79
has quality prices 0.78
has quality definition 0.76
is best 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(web site, is quality)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(domain, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(domain, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(web site, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(domain, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(web site, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(domain, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(web browser, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(domain, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(web, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(domain, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(domain name, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(domain, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(domain name, has quality prices)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(domain, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(web, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(domain, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(web browser, is best)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(domain, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(domain name, has quality definition)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(domain, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(web, has quality worth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(web site, is quality)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(domain, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(domain, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(domain, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(web, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(web, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(domain, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(domain name, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(domain name, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(domain, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(web, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(web, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(domain, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(web browser, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(web browser, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(domain, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(web, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(web, has quality worth)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(domain, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(domain name, has quality prices)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(domain name, has quality prices)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(domain, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(domain name, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(domain name, has quality definition)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(domain, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(web browser, is best)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(web browser, is best)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(domain, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(domain, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(domain, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(domain, has quality bad)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(domain, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(domain, has quality bad)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(domain, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(domain, has quality bad)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(domain, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(domain, has quality wrong)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(domain, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(domain, has quality wrong)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(domain, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(domain, has quality wrong)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(domain, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(domain, has quality bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(domain, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(domain, has quality wrong)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(domain, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(domain, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(domain, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(domain, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(domain, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(domain, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(web site, is quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(domain, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(web, has quality worth)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(domain, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(web, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(domain, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(web, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(domain, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(domain name, has quality definition)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(domain, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(domain name, has quality prices)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(domain, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(domain name, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(domain, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(web browser, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(domain, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(web browser, is best)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(domain, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(web site, is quality)