don: be mad at roger

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.57
, legend
Weight: 0.56
, time
Weight: 0.55
, artist
Weight: 0.54
, river
Weight: 0.54
Siblings young man
Weight: 0.32
, mahatma gandhi
Weight: 0.31
, knight
Weight: 0.31
, old man
Weight: 0.31
, wale
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be mad at roger 1.00
be mad at roger sterling 0.91
be mean to peggy 0.79
be obsessed with sylvia 0.76
be on kelly team 0.76
use freddy 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(don, be mad at roger)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(don, be mad at roger)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(don, be mad at roger)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(don, use freddy)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(don, be mad at roger)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(don, be obsessed with sylvia)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(don, be mad at roger)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(don, use freddy)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(don, be mad at roger)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(don, be mad at roger sterling)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(don, be mad at roger)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(don, be obsessed with sylvia)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(don, be mad at roger)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(don, be mean to peggy)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(don, be mad at roger)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(don, be mean to peggy)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(don, be mad at roger)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(don, be obsessed with sylvia)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(don, be mad at roger)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(don, be mean to peggy)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(don, be mad at roger)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(don, be mean to peggy)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(don, be mad at roger)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(don, be mad at roger sterling)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(don, be mad at roger)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(don, be on kelly team)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(don, be mad at roger)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(don, be obsessed with sylvia)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(don, be mad at roger)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(don, be on kelly team)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(don, be mad at roger)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(don, use freddy)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(don, be mad at roger)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(don, be on kelly team)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(don, be mad at roger)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(don, be mad at roger sterling)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(don, be mad at roger)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(don, be on kelly team)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(don, be mad at roger)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(don, be mad at roger sterling)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(don, be mad at roger)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(don, use freddy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(don, be mad at roger)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(don, be mad at roger)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(don, be mad at roger)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(don, be mad at roger)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(don, be mad at roger)