don: be mean to peggy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.57
, legend
Weight: 0.56
, time
Weight: 0.55
, artist
Weight: 0.54
, river
Weight: 0.54
Siblings young man
Weight: 0.32
, mahatma gandhi
Weight: 0.31
, knight
Weight: 0.31
, old man
Weight: 0.31
, wale
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be mean to peggy 1.00
be obsessed with sylvia 0.80
be mad at roger 0.79
propose megan 0.79
use freddy 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(don, be mean to peggy)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(don, be mean to peggy)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(don, be mean to peggy)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(don, use freddy)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(don, be mean to peggy)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(don, be obsessed with sylvia)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(don, be mean to peggy)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(don, be obsessed with sylvia)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(don, be mean to peggy)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(don, use freddy)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(don, be mean to peggy)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(don, be obsessed with sylvia)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(don, be mean to peggy)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(don, be mad at roger)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(don, be mean to peggy)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(don, be obsessed with sylvia)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(don, be mean to peggy)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(don, use freddy)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(don, be mean to peggy)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(don, be mad at roger)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(don, be mean to peggy)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(don, propose megan)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(don, be mean to peggy)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(don, be mad at roger)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(don, be mean to peggy)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(don, be mad at roger)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(don, be mean to peggy)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(don, propose megan)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(don, be mean to peggy)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(don, propose megan)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(don, be mean to peggy)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(don, propose megan)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(don, be mean to peggy)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(don, use freddy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(don, be mean to peggy)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(don, be mean to peggy)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(don, be mean to peggy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(don, be mean to peggy)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(don, be mean to peggy)