don: be obsessed with sylvia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.57
, legend
Weight: 0.56
, time
Weight: 0.55
, artist
Weight: 0.54
, river
Weight: 0.54
Siblings young man
Weight: 0.32
, mahatma gandhi
Weight: 0.31
, knight
Weight: 0.31
, old man
Weight: 0.31
, wale
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be obsessed with sylvia 1.00
be mean to peggy 0.80
be mad at roger 0.76
use freddy 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(don, be obsessed with sylvia)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(don, be obsessed with sylvia)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(don, be obsessed with sylvia)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(don, use freddy)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(don, be obsessed with sylvia)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(don, use freddy)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(don, be obsessed with sylvia)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(don, be mean to peggy)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(don, be obsessed with sylvia)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(don, be mean to peggy)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(don, be obsessed with sylvia)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(don, be mean to peggy)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(don, be obsessed with sylvia)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(don, be mean to peggy)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(don, be obsessed with sylvia)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(don, be mad at roger)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(don, be obsessed with sylvia)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(don, use freddy)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(don, be obsessed with sylvia)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(don, be mad at roger)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(don, be obsessed with sylvia)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(don, be mad at roger)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(don, be obsessed with sylvia)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(don, be mad at roger)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(don, be obsessed with sylvia)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(don, use freddy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(don, be obsessed with sylvia)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(don, be obsessed with sylvia)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(don, be obsessed with sylvia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(don, be obsessed with sylvia)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(don, be obsessed with sylvia)