donkey: be with cows

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents horse
Weight: 0.68
, animal
Weight: 0.65
, creature
Weight: 0.60
, equine
Weight: 0.55
Siblings llama
Weight: 0.37
, goat
Weight: 0.36
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.36
, guinea pig
Weight: 0.36
, reindeer
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be with cows 1.00
live with cows 0.97
be put with cows 0.96
protect cows 0.91
be in pastures with cows 0.90
be put in fields with cows 0.90
be in cow pastures 0.87
be kept with cattle 0.85
be kept with sheep 0.82
kill baby goats 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(donkey, be with cows)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(llama, protect cows)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(donkey, be with cows)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(llama, be kept with sheep)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(donkey, be with cows)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(llama, protect cows)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(llama, protect cows)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(donkey, be with cows)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(llama, be kept with sheep)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(llama, be kept with sheep)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(donkey, be with cows)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(donkey, be with cows)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(donkey, be with cows)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(donkey, be put in fields with cows)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(donkey, be with cows)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(donkey, be put in fields with cows)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(donkey, be with cows)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(donkey, be put in fields with cows)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(donkey, be with cows)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(donkey, be kept with cattle)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(donkey, be with cows)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(donkey, be kept with cattle)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(donkey, be with cows)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(donkey, be kept with sheep)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(donkey, be with cows)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(donkey, be kept with cattle)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(donkey, be with cows)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(donkey, be kept with sheep)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(donkey, be with cows)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(donkey, be kept with sheep)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(donkey, be with cows)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(donkey, be put in fields with cows)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(donkey, be with cows)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(donkey, be kept with cattle)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(donkey, be with cows)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(donkey, be kept with sheep)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(donkey, be with cows)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(donkey, be with cows)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(donkey, be with cows)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(donkey, be with cows)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(donkey, be with cows)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(donkey, be with cows)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(llama, protect cows)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(donkey, be with cows)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(llama, be kept with sheep)