donkey: protect themselves

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents horse
Weight: 0.68
, animal
Weight: 0.65
, creature
Weight: 0.60
Siblings llama
Weight: 0.37
, goat
Weight: 0.36
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.36
, guinea pig
Weight: 0.36
, reindeer
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
protect themselves 1.00
protect themeselfs 0.89
protect itself 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(donkey, protect themselves)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(reindeer, protect themselves)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(donkey, protect themselves)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(llama, protect themselves)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(donkey, protect themselves)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(reindeer, protect themselves)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(reindeer, protect themselves)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(donkey, protect themselves)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(llama, protect themselves)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(llama, protect themselves)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(donkey, protect themselves)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(donkey, protect themselves)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(donkey, protect themselves)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(donkey, protect themeselfs)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(donkey, protect themselves)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(donkey, protect itself)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(donkey, protect themselves)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(donkey, protect itself)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(donkey, protect themselves)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(donkey, protect themeselfs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(donkey, protect themselves)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(donkey, protect themeselfs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(donkey, protect themselves)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(donkey, protect itself)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(donkey, protect themselves)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(donkey, protect themeselfs)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(donkey, protect themselves)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(donkey, protect itself)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(donkey, protect themselves)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(donkey, protect themselves)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(donkey, protect themselves)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(donkey, protect themselves)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(donkey, protect themselves)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(donkey, protect themselves)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(reindeer, protect themselves)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(donkey, protect themselves)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(llama, protect themselves)