donut: be at conference

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.58
, snack
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, bad food
Weight: 0.55
, junk food
Weight: 0.54
Siblings pretzel
Weight: 0.35
, sandwich
Weight: 0.35
, muffin
Weight: 0.35
, chocolate cake
Weight: 0.35
, bagel
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at conference 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(junk food, be at conference)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(donut, be at conference)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(bad food, be at conference)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(donut, be at conference)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(donut, be at conference)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(bad food, be at conference)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(donut, be at conference)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(junk food, be at conference)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(donut, be at conference)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be at conference)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(donut, be at conference)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(bad food, be at conference)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(junk food, be at conference)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(donut, be at conference)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(donut, be at conference)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(bad food, be at conference)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(donut, be at conference)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(donut, be at conference)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(donut, be at conference)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(donut, be at conference)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(donut, be at conference)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(donut, be at conference)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(donut, be at conference)

Typical implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(donut, be at conference)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(donut, be at conference)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(donut, be at conference)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(bad food, be at conference)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(donut, be at conference)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(junk food, be at conference)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(donut, be at conference)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(bad food, be at conference)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(donut, be at conference)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(junk food, be at conference)