donut: be popular in us

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.58
, snack
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, junk food
Weight: 0.54
Siblings pretzel
Weight: 0.35
, sandwich
Weight: 0.35
, muffin
Weight: 0.35
, chocolate cake
Weight: 0.35
, bagel
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be popular in us 1.00
is popular 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(junk food, is popular)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(donut, be popular in us)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(donut, be popular in us)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(junk food, is popular)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(donut, be popular in us)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is popular)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(donut, be popular in us)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, is popular)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(junk food, is popular)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(donut, be popular in us)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(donut, be popular in us)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(donut, be popular in us)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(sandwich, is popular)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(sandwich, is popular)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(donut, be popular in us)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(donut, be popular in us)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(donut, be popular in us)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(donut, is popular)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(donut, be popular in us)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(donut, is popular)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(donut, be popular in us)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(donut, is popular)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(donut, be popular in us)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(donut, is popular)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(donut, be popular in us)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(donut, be popular in us)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(donut, be popular in us)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(donut, be popular in us)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(donut, be popular in us)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(donut, be popular in us)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(junk food, is popular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(donut, be popular in us)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(sandwich, is popular)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(donut, be popular in us)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(junk food, is popular)