donut: have holes in them

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.58
, snack
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, bad food
Weight: 0.55
, junk food
Weight: 0.54
Siblings pretzel
Weight: 0.35
, sandwich
Weight: 0.35
, muffin
Weight: 0.35
, chocolate cake
Weight: 0.35
, bagel
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have holes in them 1.00
have in holes 0.95
be with holes 0.94
have holes in middle 0.91
be made with holes 0.91
has physical part holes 0.89
have holes book 0.88
have holes in center 0.88
be with holes filled 0.86
be has hole 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(donut, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(bagel, has physical part holes)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(donut, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bagel, have holes in middle)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(donut, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(bagel, have holes in them)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(donut, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bagel, have in holes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(donut, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(bagel, have in holes)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(bagel, have in holes)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(donut, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(bagel, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(bagel, have holes in them)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(donut, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(bagel, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(bagel, has physical part holes)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(donut, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(bagel, have holes in middle)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(bagel, have holes in middle)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(donut, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(donut, have holes in them)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(donut, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(donut, have holes in middle)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(donut, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(donut, be made with holes)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(donut, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(donut, be made with holes)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(donut, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(donut, have holes in middle)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(donut, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(donut, have holes in center)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(donut, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(donut, have in holes)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(donut, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(donut, be made with holes)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(donut, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(donut, be has hole)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(donut, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(donut, be has hole)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(donut, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(donut, be has hole)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(donut, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(donut, be with holes filled)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(donut, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(donut, be with holes filled)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(donut, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(donut, have in holes)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(donut, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(donut, have holes in center)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(donut, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(donut, have holes book)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(donut, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(donut, have in holes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(donut, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(donut, have holes book)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(donut, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(donut, have in holes)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(donut, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(donut, has physical part holes)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(donut, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(donut, be with holes filled)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(donut, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(donut, be made with holes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(donut, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(donut, has physical part holes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(donut, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(donut, have holes in middle)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(donut, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(donut, be has hole)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(donut, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(donut, have holes book)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(donut, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(donut, have holes in center)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(donut, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(donut, has physical part holes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(donut, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(donut, have holes book)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(donut, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(donut, be with holes filled)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(donut, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(donut, has physical part holes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(donut, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(donut, have holes in middle)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(donut, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(donut, have holes in center)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(donut, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(donut, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(donut, have holes in them)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(donut, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(donut, have holes in them)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(donut, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(bagel, have in holes)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(donut, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(bagel, has physical part holes)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(donut, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(bagel, have holes in middle)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(donut, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(bagel, have holes in them)