donut: have in holes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.58
, snack
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, bad food
Weight: 0.55
, junk food
Weight: 0.54
Siblings pretzel
Weight: 0.35
, sandwich
Weight: 0.35
, muffin
Weight: 0.35
, chocolate cake
Weight: 0.35
, bagel
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have in holes 1.00
be with holes 0.99
have holes in them 0.95
be made with holes 0.95
have holes in middle 0.94
has physical part holes 0.93
have holes book 0.91
have holes in center 0.91
be has hole 0.90
be with holes filled 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(donut, have in holes)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(bagel, has physical part holes)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(donut, have in holes)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bagel, have holes in middle)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(donut, have in holes)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(bagel, have holes in them)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(donut, have in holes)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bagel, have in holes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(donut, have in holes)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(bagel, have in holes)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(bagel, have in holes)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(donut, have in holes)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(bagel, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(bagel, has physical part holes)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(donut, have in holes)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(bagel, have holes in middle)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(bagel, have holes in middle)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(donut, have in holes)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(bagel, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(bagel, have holes in them)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(donut, have in holes)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(donut, have in holes)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(donut, have in holes)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(donut, have holes in middle)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(donut, have in holes)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(donut, be made with holes)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(donut, have in holes)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(donut, be has hole)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(donut, have in holes)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(donut, be has hole)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(donut, have in holes)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(donut, be made with holes)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(donut, have in holes)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(donut, have holes in center)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(donut, have in holes)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(donut, be has hole)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(donut, have in holes)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(donut, be made with holes)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(donut, have in holes)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(donut, be with holes filled)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(donut, have in holes)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(donut, have holes in middle)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(donut, have in holes)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(donut, be with holes filled)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(donut, have in holes)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(donut, have holes book)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(donut, have in holes)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(donut, be with holes filled)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(donut, have in holes)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(donut, be has hole)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(donut, have in holes)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(donut, has physical part holes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(donut, have in holes)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(donut, be made with holes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(donut, have in holes)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(donut, have holes in center)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(donut, have in holes)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(donut, have holes book)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(donut, have in holes)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(donut, have holes in middle)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(donut, have in holes)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(donut, have holes book)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(donut, have in holes)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(donut, have holes in them)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(donut, have in holes)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(donut, has physical part holes)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(donut, have in holes)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(donut, be with holes filled)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(donut, have in holes)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(donut, have holes book)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(donut, have in holes)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(donut, has physical part holes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(donut, have in holes)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(donut, have holes in center)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(donut, have in holes)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(donut, have holes in them)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(donut, have in holes)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(donut, have holes in them)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(donut, have in holes)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(donut, has physical part holes)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(donut, have in holes)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(donut, have holes in middle)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(donut, have in holes)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(donut, have holes in them)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(donut, have in holes)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(donut, have holes in center)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(donut, have in holes)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(donut, have in holes)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(donut, have in holes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(donut, have in holes)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(donut, have in holes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(donut, have in holes)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(bagel, have in holes)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(donut, have in holes)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(bagel, has physical part holes)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(donut, have in holes)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(bagel, have holes in middle)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(donut, have in holes)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(bagel, have holes in them)