door with lock: be at office

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at office 1.00
be at office buildng 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(door with lock, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(door with lock, be at office)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(door with lock, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(door with lock, be at office buildng)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(door with lock, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(door with lock, be at office buildng)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(door with lock, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(door with lock, be at office buildng)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(door with lock, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(door with lock, be at office buildng)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(door with lock, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(door with lock, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(door with lock, be at office)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(door with lock, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(door with lock, be at office)