door: be at office

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents doorway
Weight: 0.65
, window
Weight: 0.64
, bedroom
Weight: 0.63
, way
Weight: 0.61
Siblings front door
Weight: 0.87
, refrigerator
Weight: 0.70
, gate
Weight: 0.62
, trunk
Weight: 0.60
, closet
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at office 1.00
be find in office 0.91
be at office build 0.88
be at office wall 0.83
be used to store office supply 0.80
be at lock in office build 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(window, be find in office)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(door, be at office)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(window, be at office)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(door, be at office)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(window, be at office wall)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(door, be at office)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(door, be at office)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(window, be at office)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(door, be at office)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(window, be find in office)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(door, be at office)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(window, be at office wall)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(door, be at office)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(window, be at office)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(door, be at office)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(window, be find in office)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(door, be at office)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(window, be at office wall)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(door, be at office)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(closet, be used to store office supply)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(window, be at office)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(door, be at office)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(door, be at office)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(window, be find in office)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(door, be at office)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(door, be at office)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(window, be at office wall)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(door, be at office)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(door, be at office)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(door, be at office)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(closet, be used to store office supply)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(closet, be used to store office supply)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(door, be at office)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(door, be at office)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(door, be at office)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(door, be at office build)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(door, be at office)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(door, be at lock in office build)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(door, be at office)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(door, be at office build)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(door, be at office)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(door, be at office build)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(door, be at office)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(door, be at office build)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(door, be at office)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(door, be at lock in office build)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(door, be at office)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(door, be at lock in office build)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(door, be at office)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(door, be at lock in office build)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(door, be at office)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(door, be at office)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(door, be at office)

Typical implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(door, be at office)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(door, be at office)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(door, be at office)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(window, be at office)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(door, be at office)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(window, be find in office)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(door, be at office)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(window, be at office wall)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(door, be at office)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(closet, be used to store office supply)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(door, be at office)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(window, be at office)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(door, be at office)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(window, be find in office)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(door, be at office)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(window, be at office wall)