double: get paid less

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hit
Weight: 0.60
, grand slam
Weight: 0.58
, home run
Weight: 0.54
, day
Weight: 0.51
Siblings takeout
Weight: 0.36
, triple
Weight: 0.36
, single
Weight: 0.33
, homer
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
get paid less 1.00
get paid 0.93
get taxed more 0.80
be much better than days 0.80
be cheaper than return 0.79
pay more taxes 0.79
pay higher taxes 0.78
be harder than day 1 0.77
be longer than than summer 0.77
have more likely 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(double, get paid less) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(single, pay more taxes)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(double, get paid less) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(single, pay higher taxes)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(double, get paid less) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(single, get taxed more)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(double, get paid less) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(single, have more likely)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(double, get paid less) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(single, be cheaper than return)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(double, get paid less) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(single, pay more taxes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(single, pay more taxes)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(double, get paid less) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(single, get taxed more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(single, get taxed more)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(double, get paid less) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(single, pay higher taxes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(single, pay higher taxes)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(double, get paid less) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(single, be cheaper than return) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(single, be cheaper than return)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(double, get paid less) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(single, have more likely) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(single, have more likely)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(double, get paid less) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(double, get paid less)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(double, get paid less) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(double, get paid)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(double, get paid less) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(double, get paid)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(double, get paid less) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(double, get paid)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(double, get paid less) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(double, get paid)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(double, get paid less) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(double, get paid less) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(double, get paid less)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(double, get paid less) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(double, get paid less)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(double, get paid less) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(single, pay more taxes)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(double, get paid less) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(single, get taxed more)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(double, get paid less) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(single, pay higher taxes)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(double, get paid less) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(single, be cheaper than return)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(double, get paid less) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(single, have more likely)