dough: has physical part quick

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.55
, attachment
Weight: 0.50
, ice cream
Weight: 0.48
, sweet
Weight: 0.48
Siblings recipe
Weight: 0.59
, brioche
Weight: 0.52
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.33
, gravy
Weight: 0.33
, hot sauce
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part quick 1.00
has physical part zone 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(dough, has physical part quick)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(recipe, has physical part quick)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(dough, has physical part quick)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(gravy, has physical part quick)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(dough, has physical part quick)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(recipe, has physical part quick)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(recipe, has physical part quick)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(dough, has physical part quick)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(gravy, has physical part quick)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(gravy, has physical part quick)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(dough, has physical part quick)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(dough, has physical part quick)

Similarity expansion

0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(dough, has physical part quick)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(dough, has physical part zone)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(dough, has physical part quick)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(dough, has physical part zone)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(dough, has physical part quick)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(dough, has physical part zone)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(dough, has physical part quick)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(dough, has physical part zone)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(dough, has physical part quick)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(dough, has physical part quick)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(dough, has physical part quick)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(dough, has physical part quick)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(dough, has physical part quick)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(dough, has physical part quick)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(recipe, has physical part quick)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(dough, has physical part quick)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(gravy, has physical part quick)