doughnut: has quality good

Related concepts

Parents	product Weight: 0.51 , snack Weight: 0.48 , thing Weight: 0.48 , junk food Weight: 0.48 , time Weight: 0.46
Siblings	dairy product Weight: 0.28 , fast food Weight: 0.27 , carbonated beverage Weight: 0.27 , soy sauce Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality good	1.00
has quality worth	0.85
taste good	0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.94

Plausible(time, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(doughnut, has quality good)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(junk food, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(doughnut, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(doughnut, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(junk food, has quality good)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(doughnut, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(time, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(doughnut, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality good)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(doughnut, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(time, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(doughnut, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(soy sauce, has quality good)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(doughnut, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(carbonated beverage, has quality worth)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(doughnut, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality good)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(doughnut, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(soy sauce, taste good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.94

Plausible(time, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

Remarkable(doughnut, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(doughnut, has quality good)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(junk food, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

Remarkable(doughnut, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(doughnut, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(doughnut, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(fast food, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(fast food, has quality good)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(doughnut, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

Remarkable(soy sauce, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(soy sauce, has quality good)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(doughnut, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(carbonated beverage, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(carbonated beverage, has quality worth)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(doughnut, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

Remarkable(soy sauce, taste good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(soy sauce, taste good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(doughnut, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Salient(doughnut, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.93

Salient(doughnut, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Salient(doughnut, has quality worth)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(doughnut, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(doughnut, has quality worth)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.93

Salient(doughnut, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Salient(doughnut, taste good)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(doughnut, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(doughnut, has quality worth)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(doughnut, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(doughnut, taste good)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(doughnut, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(doughnut, taste good)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.71

Remarkable(doughnut, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(doughnut, has quality worth)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.71

Remarkable(doughnut, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(doughnut, taste good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

Salient(doughnut, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(doughnut, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(doughnut, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(doughnut, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(doughnut, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(doughnut, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(junk food, has quality good)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(doughnut, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(time, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(doughnut, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(fast food, has quality good)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(doughnut, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(soy sauce, has quality good)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(doughnut, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(carbonated beverage, has quality worth)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(doughnut, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(soy sauce, taste good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(doughnut, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(junk food, has quality good)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(doughnut, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(time, has quality good)