draft: be bad for babies

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents document
Weight: 0.65
, option
Weight: 0.58
, issue
Weight: 0.56
, proposal
Weight: 0.56
Siblings typescript
Weight: 0.46
, amendment
Weight: 0.32
, declaration
Weight: 0.32
, blueprint
Weight: 0.32
, manuscript
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for babies 1.00
be bad for dogs 0.80
be bad for birds 0.77
be for life passed from parents to offspring 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(draft, be bad for babies)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(blueprint, be for life passed from parents to offspring)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(draft, be bad for babies)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(blueprint, be for life passed from parents to offspring)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(blueprint, be for life passed from parents to offspring)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(draft, be bad for babies)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(draft, be bad for babies)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(draft, be bad for babies)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(draft, be bad for birds)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(draft, be bad for babies)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(draft, be bad for dogs)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(draft, be bad for babies)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(draft, be bad for birds)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(draft, be bad for babies)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(draft, be bad for dogs)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(draft, be bad for babies)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(draft, be bad for birds)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(draft, be bad for babies)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(draft, be bad for dogs)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(draft, be bad for babies)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(draft, be bad for birds)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(draft, be bad for babies)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(draft, be bad for dogs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(draft, be bad for babies)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(draft, be bad for babies)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(draft, be bad for babies)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(draft, be bad for babies)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(draft, be bad for babies)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(draft, be bad for babies)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(blueprint, be for life passed from parents to offspring)