dragon: be at forest

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.71
, monster
Weight: 0.65
, symbol
Weight: 0.64
, movie
Weight: 0.62
Siblings unicorn
Weight: 0.38
, lizard
Weight: 0.37
, monkey
Weight: 0.37
, fairy
Weight: 0.37
, demon
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at forest 1.00
be at tropical forest 0.88
be at rain forest 0.88
be at zoo or tropical forest 0.86
be at indian forest 0.83
be at rainforest 0.82
be at tropical rainforest 0.79
be at it natural habitat 0.77
be at costa rican forest 0.77
be at wilderness area away from person 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(creature, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(dragon, be at forest)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(dragon, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(creature, be at forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(dragon, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(creature, be at forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(dragon, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at rain forest)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(dragon, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at tropical forest)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(dragon, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at indian forest)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(dragon, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(dragon, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at costa rican forest)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(dragon, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at rainforest)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(dragon, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at it natural habitat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(creature, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(dragon, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(dragon, be at forest)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(dragon, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(monkey, be at tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at tropical forest)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(dragon, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(monkey, be at indian forest)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at indian forest)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(dragon, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(dragon, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(monkey, be at rainforest)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at rainforest)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(dragon, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(monkey, be at rain forest)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at rain forest)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(dragon, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(dragon, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(monkey, be at costa rican forest)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at costa rican forest)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(dragon, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(dragon, be at forest)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(dragon, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(dragon, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(dragon, be at forest)

Typical implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(dragon, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(dragon, be at forest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(dragon, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(creature, be at forest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(dragon, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(monkey, be at tropical forest)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(dragon, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(dragon, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(monkey, be at rain forest)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(dragon, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(monkey, be at rainforest)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(dragon, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(monkey, be at indian forest)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(dragon, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(dragon, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(monkey, be at costa rican forest)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(dragon, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(creature, be at forest)