dragon: be weak to ice

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.71
, beast
Weight: 0.66
, monster
Weight: 0.65
, symbol
Weight: 0.64
Siblings komodo dragon
Weight: 0.43
, unicorn
Weight: 0.38
, lizard
Weight: 0.37
, monkey
Weight: 0.37
, fairy
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be weak to ice 1.00
is weak 0.85
be weak to fairy 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(beast, is weak)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(dragon, be weak to ice)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(dragon, be weak to ice)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(beast, is weak)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(dragon, be weak to ice)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(beast, is weak)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(beast, is weak)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(dragon, be weak to ice)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(dragon, be weak to ice)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(dragon, be weak to ice)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(dragon, be weak to ice)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(dragon, be weak to ice)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(dragon, is weak)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(dragon, be weak to ice)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(dragon, is weak)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(dragon, be weak to ice)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(dragon, is weak)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(dragon, be weak to ice)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(dragon, is weak)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(dragon, be weak to ice)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(dragon, be weak to ice)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(dragon, be weak to ice)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(dragon, be weak to ice)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(dragon, be weak to ice)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(dragon, be weak to ice)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(beast, is weak)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(dragon, be weak to ice)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(beast, is weak)