dragon: is endangered

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.71
, beast
Weight: 0.66
, monster
Weight: 0.65
, symbol
Weight: 0.64
Siblings komodo dragon
Weight: 0.43
, unicorn
Weight: 0.38
, lizard
Weight: 0.37
, monkey
Weight: 0.37
, fairy
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is endangered 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(dragon, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(lizard, is endangered)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(dragon, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(monkey, is endangered)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(dragon, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(komodo dragon, is endangered)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(dragon, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(komodo dragon, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(komodo dragon, is endangered)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(dragon, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(monkey, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(monkey, is endangered)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(dragon, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(lizard, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(lizard, is endangered)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(dragon, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(dragon, is endangered)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(dragon, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(dragon, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(dragon, is endangered)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(dragon, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(dragon, is endangered)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(dragon, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(komodo dragon, is endangered)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(dragon, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(lizard, is endangered)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(dragon, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(monkey, is endangered)