drink: be colder after mint

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.76
, beer
Weight: 0.67
, meal
Weight: 0.65
, beverage
Weight: 0.61
Siblings drinking water
Weight: 0.77
, chocolate milk
Weight: 0.75
, apple juice
Weight: 0.74
, carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.73
, drinking beer
Weight: 0.73

Related properties

Property Similarity
be colder after mint 1.00
eating mint 0.85
feel cooler 0.77
taste better cold 0.77
taste worse at room temperature 0.76
is better cold 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(beverage, taste better cold)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(drink, be colder after mint)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(beverage, taste worse at room temperature)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(drink, be colder after mint)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(drink, be colder after mint)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(beverage, taste worse at room temperature)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(drink, be colder after mint)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(beverage, taste better cold)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(drink, be colder after mint)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(beverage, taste worse at room temperature)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(drink, be colder after mint)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(beverage, taste better cold)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(beverage, taste better cold)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(drink, be colder after mint)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(drink, be colder after mint)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(beverage, taste worse at room temperature)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(drink, be colder after mint)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(drink, be colder after mint)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(drink, be colder after mint)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(drink, be colder after mint)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(drink, be colder after mint)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(drink, eating mint)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(drink, be colder after mint)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(drink, eating mint)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(drink, be colder after mint)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(drink, eating mint)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(drink, be colder after mint)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(drink, eating mint)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(drink, be colder after mint)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(drink, taste better cold)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(drink, be colder after mint)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(drink, taste better cold)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(drink, be colder after mint)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(drink, taste better cold)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(drink, be colder after mint)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(drink, taste better cold)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(drink, be colder after mint)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(drink, be colder after mint)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(drink, be colder after mint)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(drink, be colder after mint)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(drink, be colder after mint)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(drink, be colder after mint)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(beverage, taste worse at room temperature)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(drink, be colder after mint)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(beverage, taste better cold)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(drink, be colder after mint)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(beverage, taste worse at room temperature)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(drink, be colder after mint)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(beverage, taste better cold)