drink: be in glass

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.76
, beer
Weight: 0.67
, meal
Weight: 0.65
, beverage
Weight: 0.61
Siblings drinking water
Weight: 0.77
, chocolate milk
Weight: 0.75
, apple juice
Weight: 0.74
, carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.73
, drinking beer
Weight: 0.73

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in glass 1.00
be better in glass 0.95
be in glass bottles 0.92
have made from glass bottles 0.91
have made from colored glass bottles 0.89
taste better in glass bottles 0.88
be sold in glass bottles 0.88
taste better out of glass bottles 0.88
stay in plastic bottle 0.80
stay in bottle 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(meal, be in glass)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(drink, be in glass)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(beverage, taste better in glass bottles)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(drink, be in glass)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(drink, be in glass)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(meal, be in glass)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(drink, be in glass)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(beverage, taste better in glass bottles)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(drink, be in glass)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(meal, be in glass)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(drink, be in glass)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(beverage, taste better in glass bottles)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(meal, be in glass)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(drink, be in glass)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(drink, be in glass)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(beverage, taste better in glass bottles)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(drink, be in glass)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(drink, be in glass)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(drink, be in glass)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(drink, be in glass)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(drink, be in glass)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(drink, be better in glass)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(drink, be in glass)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(drink, be better in glass)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(drink, be in glass)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(drink, stay in plastic bottle)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(drink, be in glass)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(drink, be better in glass)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(drink, be in glass)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(drink, stay in bottle)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(drink, be in glass)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(drink, stay in bottle)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(drink, be in glass)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(drink, stay in bottle)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(drink, be in glass)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(drink, stay in bottle)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(drink, be in glass)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(drink, be better in glass)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(drink, be in glass)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(drink, stay in plastic bottle)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(drink, be in glass)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(drink, stay in plastic bottle)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(drink, be in glass)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(drink, stay in plastic bottle)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(drink, be in glass)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(drink, be in glass)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(drink, be in glass)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(drink, be in glass)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(drink, be in glass)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(drink, be in glass)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(meal, be in glass)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(drink, be in glass)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(beverage, taste better in glass bottles)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(drink, be in glass)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(meal, be in glass)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(drink, be in glass)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(beverage, taste better in glass bottles)