drink: eating chocolate

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.76
, beer
Weight: 0.67
, meal
Weight: 0.65
, beverage
Weight: 0.61
Siblings drinking water
Weight: 0.77
, chocolate milk
Weight: 0.75
, apple juice
Weight: 0.74
, carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.73
, drinking beer
Weight: 0.73

Related properties

Property Similarity
eating chocolate 1.00
feel ice eating 0.84
seem eating 0.84
eating mint 0.83
is delicous 0.77
have burned marshmallow flavor 0.77
is delicious 0.77
is soda 0.76
be more fattening than wine 0.76
be after meal bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(beer, be more fattening than wine)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(drink, eating chocolate)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(drink, eating chocolate)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(beer, be more fattening than wine)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(drink, eating chocolate)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(beer, be more fattening than wine)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(drink, eating chocolate)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(drinking water, be after meal bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(beer, be more fattening than wine)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(drink, eating chocolate)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(drink, eating chocolate)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(drink, eating chocolate)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(drinking water, be after meal bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(drinking water, be after meal bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(drink, eating chocolate)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(drink, eating chocolate)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(drink, eating chocolate)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(drink, eating mint)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(drink, eating chocolate)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(drink, eating mint)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(drink, eating chocolate)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(drink, eating mint)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(drink, eating chocolate)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(drink, feel ice eating)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(drink, eating chocolate)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(drink, feel ice eating)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(drink, eating chocolate)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(drink, feel ice eating)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(drink, eating chocolate)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(drink, eating mint)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(drink, eating chocolate)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(drink, feel ice eating)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(drink, eating chocolate)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(drink, is soda)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(drink, eating chocolate)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(drink, is soda)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(drink, eating chocolate)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(drink, is soda)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(drink, eating chocolate)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(drink, is soda)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(drink, eating chocolate)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(drink, eating chocolate)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(drink, eating chocolate)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(drink, eating chocolate)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(drink, eating chocolate)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(drink, eating chocolate)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(beer, be more fattening than wine)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(drink, eating chocolate)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(drinking water, be after meal bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(drink, eating chocolate)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(beer, be more fattening than wine)