drinking water: has state problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents drink
Weight: 0.77
, water
Weight: 0.76
, fresh water
Weight: 0.75
, beverage
Weight: 0.67
Siblings bottled water
Weight: 0.78
, fluoride
Weight: 0.67
, reservoir
Weight: 0.61
, salt water
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state problem 1.00
has state clear 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(water, has state clear)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(drinking water, has state problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(drinking water, has state problem)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(water, has state clear)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(drinking water, has state problem)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(water, has state clear)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(drinking water, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(fluoride, has state problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(drinking water, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, has state problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(water, has state clear)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(drinking water, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(drinking water, has state problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(drinking water, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(fluoride, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(fluoride, has state problem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(drinking water, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(bottled water, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(bottled water, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(drinking water, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(drinking water, has state problem)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(drinking water, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(drinking water, has state clear)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(drinking water, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(drinking water, has state clear)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(drinking water, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(drinking water, has state clear)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(drinking water, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(drinking water, has state clear)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(drinking water, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(drinking water, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(drinking water, has state problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(drinking water, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(drinking water, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(drinking water, has state problem)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(water, has state clear)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(drinking water, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(fluoride, has state problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(drinking water, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(bottled water, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(drinking water, has state problem)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(water, has state clear)