drive: be called hard disk

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.64
, hit
Weight: 0.61
, quality
Weight: 0.61
, movie
Weight: 0.59
Siblings hard drive
Weight: 0.78
, disk drive
Weight: 0.75
, driver
Weight: 0.33
, fast car
Weight: 0.33
, hard work
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called hard disk 1.00
need defragmenting 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(drive, be called hard disk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, need defragmenting)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(drive, be called hard disk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, be called hard disk)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(drive, be called hard disk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(hard drive, be called hard disk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(hard drive, be called hard disk)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(drive, be called hard disk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(hard drive, need defragmenting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(hard drive, need defragmenting)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(drive, be called hard disk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(drive, be called hard disk)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(drive, be called hard disk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(drive, need defragmenting)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(drive, be called hard disk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(drive, need defragmenting)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(drive, be called hard disk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(drive, need defragmenting)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(drive, be called hard disk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(drive, need defragmenting)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(drive, be called hard disk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(drive, be called hard disk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(drive, be called hard disk)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(drive, be called hard disk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(drive, be called hard disk)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(drive, be called hard disk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(hard drive, be called hard disk)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(drive, be called hard disk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(hard drive, need defragmenting)