drive: be in computers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.64
, hit
Weight: 0.61
, quality
Weight: 0.61
, movie
Weight: 0.59
Siblings hard drive
Weight: 0.78
, disk drive
Weight: 0.75
, driver
Weight: 0.33
, fast car
Weight: 0.33
, hard work
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in computers 1.00
be important for computer 0.87
be identified on computers 0.86
be identified on macintosh computers 0.78
be identified on computer 0.77
be identified on windows-based computer 0.77
be identified in computer 0.77
be identified in mac computer 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(drive, be in computers)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, be important for computer)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(drive, be in computers)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(hard drive, be important for computer)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(hard drive, be important for computer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(drive, be in computers)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(drive, be in computers)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(drive, be in computers)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(drive, be identified on macintosh computers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(drive, be in computers)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(drive, be identified on macintosh computers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(drive, be in computers)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(drive, be identified on macintosh computers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(drive, be in computers)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(drive, be identified in mac computer)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(drive, be in computers)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(drive, be identified in mac computer)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(drive, be in computers)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(drive, be identified in mac computer)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(drive, be in computers)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(drive, be identified on windows-based computer)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(drive, be in computers)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(drive, be identified on windows-based computer)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(drive, be in computers)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(drive, be identified on windows-based computer)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(drive, be in computers)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(drive, be identified in mac computer)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(drive, be in computers)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(drive, be identified on macintosh computers)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(drive, be in computers)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(drive, be identified on windows-based computer)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(drive, be in computers)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(drive, be important for computer)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(drive, be in computers)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(drive, be important for computer)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(drive, be in computers)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(drive, be important for computer)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(drive, be in computers)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(drive, be important for computer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(drive, be in computers)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(drive, be in computers)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(drive, be in computers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(drive, be in computers)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(drive, be in computers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(drive, be in computers)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(hard drive, be important for computer)