drive: be less advertised

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.64
, hit
Weight: 0.61
, quality
Weight: 0.61
, movie
Weight: 0.59
Siblings hard drive
Weight: 0.78
, disk drive
Weight: 0.75
, driver
Weight: 0.33
, fast car
Weight: 0.33
, hard work
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be less advertised 1.00
be smaller advertised 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(drive, be less advertised)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, be less advertised)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(drive, be less advertised)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, be smaller advertised)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(drive, be less advertised)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(hard drive, be less advertised)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(hard drive, be less advertised)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(drive, be less advertised)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(hard drive, be smaller advertised)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(hard drive, be smaller advertised)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(drive, be less advertised)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(drive, be less advertised)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(drive, be less advertised)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(drive, be smaller advertised)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(drive, be less advertised)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(drive, be smaller advertised)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(drive, be less advertised)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(drive, be smaller advertised)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(drive, be less advertised)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(drive, be smaller advertised)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(drive, be less advertised)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(drive, be less advertised)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(drive, be less advertised)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(drive, be less advertised)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(drive, be less advertised)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(drive, be less advertised)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(hard drive, be less advertised)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(drive, be less advertised)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(hard drive, be smaller advertised)