drive: get corrupted

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.64
, hit
Weight: 0.61
, quality
Weight: 0.61
, movie
Weight: 0.59
Siblings hard drive
Weight: 0.78
, disk drive
Weight: 0.75
, driver
Weight: 0.33
, fast car
Weight: 0.33
, hard work
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
get corrupted 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(drive, get corrupted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, get corrupted)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(drive, get corrupted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(hard drive, get corrupted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(hard drive, get corrupted)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(drive, get corrupted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(drive, get corrupted)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(drive, get corrupted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(drive, get corrupted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(drive, get corrupted)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(drive, get corrupted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(drive, get corrupted)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(drive, get corrupted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(hard drive, get corrupted)