drive: is full all of sudden

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.64
, hit
Weight: 0.61
, quality
Weight: 0.61
, movie
Weight: 0.59
Siblings hard drive
Weight: 0.78
, disk drive
Weight: 0.75
, driver
Weight: 0.33
, fast car
Weight: 0.33
, hard work
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is full all of sudden 1.00
has quality full 0.77
is f full 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(drive, is full all of sudden)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, has quality full)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(drive, is full all of sudden)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(hard drive, has quality full)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(hard drive, has quality full)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(drive, is full all of sudden)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(drive, is full all of sudden)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(drive, is full all of sudden)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(drive, has quality full)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(drive, is full all of sudden)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(drive, is f full)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(drive, is full all of sudden)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(drive, has quality full)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(drive, is full all of sudden)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(drive, has quality full)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(drive, is full all of sudden)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(drive, is f full)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(drive, is full all of sudden)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(drive, is f full)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(drive, is full all of sudden)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(drive, is f full)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(drive, is full all of sudden)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(drive, has quality full)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(drive, is full all of sudden)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(drive, is full all of sudden)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(drive, is full all of sudden)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(drive, is full all of sudden)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(drive, is full all of sudden)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(drive, is full all of sudden)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(hard drive, has quality full)