drive: need defragmenting

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.64
, hit
Weight: 0.61
, quality
Weight: 0.61
, movie
Weight: 0.59
Siblings hard drive
Weight: 0.78
, disk drive
Weight: 0.75
, driver
Weight: 0.33
, fast car
Weight: 0.33
, hard work
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
need defragmenting 1.00
be called hard disk 0.79
need formatting 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(drive, need defragmenting)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, need defragmenting)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(drive, need defragmenting)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, need formatting)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(drive, need defragmenting)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, be called hard disk)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(drive, need defragmenting)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(hard drive, need defragmenting)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(hard drive, need defragmenting)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(drive, need defragmenting)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(hard drive, be called hard disk)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(hard drive, be called hard disk)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(drive, need defragmenting)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(hard drive, need formatting)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(hard drive, need formatting)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(drive, need defragmenting)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(drive, need defragmenting)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(drive, need defragmenting)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(drive, be called hard disk)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(drive, need defragmenting)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(drive, need formatting)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(drive, need defragmenting)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(drive, be called hard disk)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(drive, need defragmenting)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(drive, be called hard disk)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(drive, need defragmenting)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(drive, be called hard disk)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(drive, need defragmenting)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(drive, need formatting)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(drive, need defragmenting)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(drive, need formatting)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(drive, need defragmenting)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(drive, need formatting)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(drive, need defragmenting)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(drive, need defragmenting)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(drive, need defragmenting)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(drive, need defragmenting)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(drive, need defragmenting)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(drive, need defragmenting)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(hard drive, need defragmenting)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(drive, need defragmenting)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(hard drive, be called hard disk)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(drive, need defragmenting)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(hard drive, need formatting)