drive: need formatting

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.64
, hit
Weight: 0.61
, quality
Weight: 0.61
, movie
Weight: 0.59
Siblings hard drive
Weight: 0.78
, disk drive
Weight: 0.75
, driver
Weight: 0.33
, fast car
Weight: 0.33
, hard work
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
need formatting 1.00
lose space formatting 0.95
need formatted 0.81
is formatted 0.79
be formatted 0.79
need defragmenting 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, lose space formatting)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, need defragmenting)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, need formatting)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, need formatted)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(hard drive, is formatted)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(hard drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(hard drive, need formatting)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(hard drive, lose space formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(hard drive, lose space formatting)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(hard drive, need formatted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(hard drive, need formatted)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(hard drive, is formatted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(hard drive, is formatted)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(hard drive, need defragmenting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(hard drive, need defragmenting)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(drive, need formatting)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(drive, lose space formatting)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(drive, lose space formatting)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(drive, is formatted)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(drive, be formatted)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(drive, need defragmenting)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(drive, lose space formatting)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(drive, need defragmenting)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(drive, lose space formatting)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(drive, need defragmenting)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(drive, be formatted)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(drive, is formatted)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(drive, need formatted)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(drive, need formatted)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(drive, need formatted)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(drive, be formatted)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(drive, is formatted)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(drive, is formatted)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(drive, be formatted)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(drive, need defragmenting)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(drive, need formatted)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(drive, need formatting)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(drive, need formatting)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(hard drive, need formatting)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(hard drive, lose space formatting)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(hard drive, need formatted)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(hard drive, is formatted)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(drive, need formatting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(hard drive, need defragmenting)