driver: rush to work

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents passenger
Weight: 0.65
, soldier
Weight: 0.64
, young man
Weight: 0.63
, man
Weight: 0.63
Siblings bus driver
Weight: 0.82
, employee
Weight: 0.64
, technology
Weight: 0.63
, camera
Weight: 0.61
, fast car
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
rush to work 1.00
expect rush hour traffic to slow 0.83
hurry to work 0.82
be go to work 0.78
work 0.77
be used to work 0.76
be at work 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(driver, rush to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(camera, work)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(driver, rush to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(employee, be go to work)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(driver, rush to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(employee, work)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(driver, rush to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(employee, be at work)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(driver, rush to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(technology, work)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(driver, rush to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(technology, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(technology, work)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(driver, rush to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(employee, be go to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(employee, be go to work)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(driver, rush to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(employee, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(employee, work)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(driver, rush to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(employee, be at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(employee, be at work)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(driver, rush to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(camera, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(camera, work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(driver, rush to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(driver, rush to work)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(driver, rush to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(driver, expect rush hour traffic to slow)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(driver, rush to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(driver, work)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(driver, rush to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(driver, expect rush hour traffic to slow)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(driver, rush to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(driver, work)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(driver, rush to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(driver, expect rush hour traffic to slow)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(driver, rush to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(driver, expect rush hour traffic to slow)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(driver, rush to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(driver, work)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(driver, rush to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(driver, work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(driver, rush to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(driver, rush to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(driver, rush to work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(driver, rush to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(driver, rush to work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(driver, rush to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(employee, work)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(driver, rush to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(employee, be go to work)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(driver, rush to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(employee, be at work)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(driver, rush to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(technology, work)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(driver, rush to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(camera, work)