driving: be in england

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents behavior
Weight: 0.60
, duty
Weight: 0.57
, activity
Weight: 0.56
, issue
Weight: 0.55
, accident
Weight: 0.53
Siblings drunk driving
Weight: 0.37
, car accident
Weight: 0.34
, motor vehicle
Weight: 0.33
, vehicular accident
Weight: 0.33
, crash
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in england 1.00
be popular in europe 0.81
were treated timely in england 0.78
were treated timely in elizabethan england 0.78
be in australia 0.77
be in dallas 0.76
be in saudi arabia 0.76
be in iran 0.75
be such problem in america 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(issue, were treated timely in elizabethan england)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(driving, be in england)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(issue, were treated timely in england)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(driving, be in england)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(issue, be such problem in america)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(driving, be in england)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(behavior, be in iran)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(driving, be in england)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(issue, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(driving, be in england)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(driving, be in england)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(issue, were treated timely in england)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(driving, be in england)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(issue, be in australia)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(driving, be in england)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(issue, were treated timely in elizabethan england)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(driving, be in england)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(behavior, be in iran)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(driving, be in england)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(issue, be such problem in america)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(driving, be in england)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(issue, were treated timely in elizabethan england)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(driving, be in england)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(issue, be in australia)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(driving, be in england)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(issue, were treated timely in england)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(driving, be in england)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be in iran)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(driving, be in england)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(issue, be such problem in america)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(issue, were treated timely in elizabethan england)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(driving, be in england)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(driving, be in england)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(issue, were treated timely in england)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(driving, be in england)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(driving, be in england)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(issue, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(driving, be in england)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(driving, be in england)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(issue, be such problem in america)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(driving, be in england)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(driving, be in england)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(behavior, be in iran)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(driving, be in england)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(driving, be in england)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(driving, be in england)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(driving, be in england)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(driving, be in england)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(driving, be popular in europe)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(driving, be in england)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(driving, be popular in europe)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(driving, be in england)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(driving, be in dallas)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(driving, be in england)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(driving, be in saudi arabia)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(driving, be in england)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(driving, be in dallas)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(driving, be in england)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(driving, be in saudi arabia)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(driving, be in england)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(driving, be popular in europe)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(driving, be in england)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(driving, be in dallas)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(driving, be in england)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(driving, be in saudi arabia)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(driving, be in england)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(driving, be in saudi arabia)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(driving, be in england)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(driving, be in dallas)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(driving, be in england)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(driving, be popular in europe)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(driving, be in england)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(driving, be in england)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(driving, be in england)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(driving, be in england)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(driving, be in england)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(driving, be in england)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(issue, be such problem in america)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(driving, be in england)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(issue, be in australia)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(driving, be in england)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(behavior, be in iran)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(driving, be in england)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(issue, were treated timely in england)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(driving, be in england)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(issue, were treated timely in elizabethan england)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(driving, be in england)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(issue, were treated timely in england)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(driving, be in england)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(issue, were treated timely in elizabethan england)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(driving, be in england)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(issue, be in australia)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(driving, be in england)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(issue, be such problem in america)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(driving, be in england)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(behavior, be in iran)