driving: be is addressed in florida

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents behavior
Weight: 0.60
, duty
Weight: 0.57
, activity
Weight: 0.56
, issue
Weight: 0.55
, accident
Weight: 0.53
Siblings drunk driving
Weight: 0.37
, car accident
Weight: 0.34
, motor vehicle
Weight: 0.33
, vehicular accident
Weight: 0.33
, crash
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be is addressed in florida 1.00
be is addressed 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(driving, be is addressed in florida)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, be is addressed in florida)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(driving, be is addressed in florida)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, be is addressed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(driving, be is addressed in florida)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(drunk driving, be is addressed in florida)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(drunk driving, be is addressed in florida)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(driving, be is addressed in florida)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(drunk driving, be is addressed)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(drunk driving, be is addressed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(driving, be is addressed in florida)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(driving, be is addressed in florida)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(driving, be is addressed in florida)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(driving, be is addressed)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(driving, be is addressed in florida)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(driving, be is addressed)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(driving, be is addressed in florida)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(driving, be is addressed)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(driving, be is addressed in florida)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(driving, be is addressed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(driving, be is addressed in florida)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(driving, be is addressed in florida)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(driving, be is addressed in florida)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(driving, be is addressed in florida)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(driving, be is addressed in florida)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(driving, be is addressed in florida)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(drunk driving, be is addressed in florida)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(driving, be is addressed in florida)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(drunk driving, be is addressed)