driving: has quality organizations

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents behavior
Weight: 0.60
, duty
Weight: 0.57
, activity
Weight: 0.56
, issue
Weight: 0.55
, accident
Weight: 0.53
Siblings drunk driving
Weight: 0.37
, car accident
Weight: 0.34
, motor vehicle
Weight: 0.33
, vehicular accident
Weight: 0.33
, crash
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality organizations 1.00
be in organizations 0.94
be in organizations political 0.85
be important in community services 0.80
has quality good 0.76
be for businesses 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(issue, be for businesses)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(driving, has quality organizations)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(behavior, be in organizations political)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(driving, has quality organizations)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(behavior, be in organizations)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(driving, has quality organizations)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(duty, be important in community services)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(driving, has quality organizations)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(driving, has quality organizations)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(behavior, be in organizations)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(driving, has quality organizations)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(behavior, be in organizations political)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(driving, has quality organizations)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(duty, be important in community services)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(driving, has quality organizations)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(issue, be for businesses)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(driving, has quality organizations)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(duty, be important in community services)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(driving, has quality organizations)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be in organizations political)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(driving, has quality organizations)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be in organizations)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(driving, has quality organizations)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(issue, be for businesses)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(driving, has quality organizations)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, has quality organizations)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(driving, has quality organizations)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(crash, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(behavior, be in organizations)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(driving, has quality organizations)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(driving, has quality organizations)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(behavior, be in organizations political)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(driving, has quality organizations)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(driving, has quality organizations)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(issue, be for businesses)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(driving, has quality organizations)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(driving, has quality organizations)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(duty, be important in community services)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(driving, has quality organizations)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(driving, has quality organizations)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(driving, has quality organizations)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(drunk driving, has quality organizations)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(drunk driving, has quality organizations)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(driving, has quality organizations)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(crash, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(crash, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(driving, has quality organizations)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(driving, has quality organizations)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(driving, has quality organizations)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(driving, has quality organizations)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(driving, has quality organizations)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(driving, has quality organizations)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(driving, has quality organizations)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(driving, has quality organizations)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(behavior, be in organizations)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(driving, has quality organizations)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(duty, be important in community services)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(driving, has quality organizations)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(behavior, be in organizations political)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(driving, has quality organizations)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(issue, be for businesses)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(driving, has quality organizations)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(drunk driving, has quality organizations)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(driving, has quality organizations)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(crash, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(driving, has quality organizations)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(behavior, be in organizations)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(driving, has quality organizations)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(behavior, be in organizations political)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(driving, has quality organizations)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(duty, be important in community services)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(driving, has quality organizations)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(issue, be for businesses)