driving: is video

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents behavior
Weight: 0.60
, duty
Weight: 0.57
, activity
Weight: 0.56
, issue
Weight: 0.55
, accident
Weight: 0.53
Siblings drunk driving
Weight: 0.37
, car accident
Weight: 0.34
, motor vehicle
Weight: 0.33
, vehicular accident
Weight: 0.33
, crash
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is video 1.00
is videos 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(driving, is video)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, is video)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(driving, is video)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, is videos)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(driving, is video)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(drunk driving, is video)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(drunk driving, is video)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(driving, is video)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(drunk driving, is videos)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(drunk driving, is videos)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(driving, is video)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(driving, is video)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(driving, is video)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(driving, is videos)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(driving, is video)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(driving, is videos)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(driving, is video)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(driving, is videos)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(driving, is video)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(driving, is videos)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(driving, is video)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(driving, is video)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(driving, is video)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(driving, is video)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(driving, is video)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(driving, is video)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(drunk driving, is video)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(driving, is video)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(drunk driving, is videos)