drought: be problem in australia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents emergency
Weight: 0.64
, crisis
Weight: 0.63
, stress
Weight: 0.60
, event
Weight: 0.58
, bad weather
Weight: 0.58
Siblings flood
Weight: 0.34
, situation
Weight: 0.32
, rain
Weight: 0.32
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.32
, global warming
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be problem in australia 1.00
be in australia 0.93
happen in australia 0.90
occur in australia 0.89
be problem in mexico 0.83
be constant hazard for australia 0.83
be problem in africa 0.83
is uk 0.79
uk 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(drought, be problem in australia)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in africa)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(drought, be problem in australia)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in africa)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(drought, be problem in australia)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(drought, be problem in australia)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(drought, be problem in australia)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(drought, be in australia)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(drought, be problem in australia)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(drought, be in australia)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(drought, be problem in australia)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(drought, happen in australia)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(drought, be problem in australia)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(drought, be in australia)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(drought, be problem in australia)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(drought, happen in australia)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(drought, be problem in australia)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(drought, happen in australia)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(drought, be problem in australia)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(drought, be in australia)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(drought, be problem in australia)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(drought, happen in australia)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(drought, be problem in australia)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(drought, occur in australia)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(drought, be problem in australia)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(drought, occur in australia)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(drought, be problem in australia)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(drought, occur in australia)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(drought, be problem in australia)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(drought, occur in australia)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(drought, be problem in australia)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(drought, be problem in mexico)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(drought, be problem in australia)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(drought, be problem in africa)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(drought, be problem in australia)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(drought, be problem in mexico)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(drought, be problem in australia)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(drought, be problem in africa)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(drought, be problem in australia)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(drought, be problem in africa)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(drought, be problem in australia)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(drought, be problem in africa)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(drought, be problem in australia)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(drought, be problem in mexico)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(drought, be problem in australia)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(drought, be problem in mexico)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(drought, be problem in australia)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(drought, be constant hazard for australia)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(drought, be problem in australia)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(drought, be constant hazard for australia)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(drought, be problem in australia)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(drought, be constant hazard for australia)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(drought, be problem in australia)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(drought, be constant hazard for australia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(drought, be problem in australia)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(drought, be problem in australia)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(drought, be problem in australia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(drought, be problem in australia)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(drought, be problem in australia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(drought, be problem in australia)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be problem in africa)