drought: be problem in mexico

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents emergency
Weight: 0.64
, crisis
Weight: 0.63
, stress
Weight: 0.60
, event
Weight: 0.58
, bad weather
Weight: 0.58
Siblings flood
Weight: 0.34
, situation
Weight: 0.32
, rain
Weight: 0.32
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.32
, global warming
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be problem in mexico 1.00
be problem in australia 0.83
be problem in africa 0.83
happen in california 0.80
occur in california 0.79
be in florida 0.78
happen in australia 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(drought, be problem in mexico)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in africa)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(drought, be problem in mexico)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in africa)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(drought, be problem in mexico)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(drought, be problem in mexico)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(drought, be problem in mexico)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(drought, happen in california)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(drought, be problem in mexico)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(drought, happen in california)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(drought, be problem in mexico)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(drought, happen in california)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(drought, be problem in mexico)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(drought, happen in australia)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(drought, be problem in mexico)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(drought, happen in australia)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(drought, be problem in mexico)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(drought, happen in australia)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(drought, be problem in mexico)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(drought, happen in california)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(drought, be problem in mexico)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(drought, occur in california)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(drought, be problem in mexico)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(drought, be problem in australia)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(drought, be problem in mexico)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(drought, occur in california)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(drought, be problem in mexico)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(drought, be problem in australia)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(drought, be problem in mexico)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(drought, occur in california)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(drought, be problem in mexico)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(drought, be problem in africa)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(drought, be problem in mexico)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(drought, be problem in australia)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(drought, be problem in mexico)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(drought, happen in australia)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(drought, be problem in mexico)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(drought, occur in california)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(drought, be problem in mexico)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(drought, be problem in australia)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(drought, be problem in mexico)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(drought, be problem in africa)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(drought, be problem in mexico)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(drought, be problem in africa)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(drought, be problem in mexico)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(drought, be problem in africa)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(drought, be problem in mexico)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(drought, be problem in mexico)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(drought, be problem in mexico)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(drought, be problem in mexico)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(drought, be problem in mexico)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(drought, be problem in mexico)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be problem in africa)