drug dealer: have multiple phones

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crime
Weight: 0.64
, client
Weight: 0.63
, criminal
Weight: 0.62
, person
Weight: 0.62
Siblings drug
Weight: 0.59
, drug addict
Weight: 0.37
, drug use
Weight: 0.36
, pharmacist
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have multiple phones 1.00
have multiple cell phones 0.94
have two phones 0.93
have phones 0.91
use phones 0.89
carry two phones 0.89
have old phones 0.86
have flip phones 0.86
have cell phones 0.86
use old phones 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(drug dealer, have multiple phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(drug dealer, have multiple phones)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(drug dealer, have multiple phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(drug dealer, have two phones)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(drug dealer, have multiple phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(drug dealer, carry two phones)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(drug dealer, have multiple phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(drug dealer, carry two phones)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(drug dealer, have multiple phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(drug dealer, carry two phones)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(drug dealer, have multiple phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(drug dealer, have two phones)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(drug dealer, have multiple phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(drug dealer, carry two phones)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(drug dealer, have multiple phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(drug dealer, have two phones)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(drug dealer, have multiple phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(drug dealer, have two phones)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(drug dealer, have multiple phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(drug dealer, have multiple cell phones)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(drug dealer, have multiple phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(drug dealer, have flip phones)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(drug dealer, have multiple phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(drug dealer, have flip phones)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(drug dealer, have multiple phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(drug dealer, have flip phones)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(drug dealer, have multiple phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(drug dealer, use old phones)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(drug dealer, have multiple phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(drug dealer, have flip phones)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(drug dealer, have multiple phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(drug dealer, use old phones)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(drug dealer, have multiple phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(drug dealer, use old phones)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(drug dealer, have multiple phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(drug dealer, use old phones)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(drug dealer, have multiple phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(drug dealer, have multiple cell phones)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(drug dealer, have multiple phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(drug dealer, have old phones)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(drug dealer, have multiple phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(drug dealer, have multiple cell phones)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(drug dealer, have multiple phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(drug dealer, have multiple cell phones)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(drug dealer, have multiple phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(drug dealer, have old phones)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(drug dealer, have multiple phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(drug dealer, have old phones)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(drug dealer, have multiple phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(drug dealer, have old phones)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(drug dealer, have multiple phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(drug dealer, have multiple phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(drug dealer, have multiple phones)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(drug dealer, have multiple phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(drug dealer, have multiple phones)