drummer: be behind perspex screens

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents guitarist
Weight: 0.68
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, player
Weight: 0.60
, band
Weight: 0.60
Siblings rubber band
Weight: 0.35
, orchestra
Weight: 0.34
, band aid
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be behind perspex screens 1.00
be behind glass screens 0.89
be behind screens 0.86
sit behind screens 0.83
be behind plexiglass 0.83
be behind screen 0.82
sit behind plexiglass 0.82
have plexiglass around them 0.81
be behind glass 0.81
be behind glass at glastonbury 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(drummer, be behind perspex screens)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(drummer, be behind perspex screens)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(drummer, be behind perspex screens)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(drummer, be behind glass screens)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(drummer, be behind perspex screens)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(drummer, be behind glass screens)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(drummer, be behind perspex screens)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(drummer, be behind screen)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(drummer, be behind perspex screens)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(drummer, be behind screen)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(drummer, be behind perspex screens)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(drummer, be behind glass screens)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(drummer, be behind perspex screens)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(drummer, be behind glass at glastonbury)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(drummer, be behind perspex screens)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(drummer, be behind glass screens)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(drummer, be behind perspex screens)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(drummer, be behind screen)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(drummer, be behind perspex screens)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(drummer, be behind glass at glastonbury)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(drummer, be behind perspex screens)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(drummer, be behind screen)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(drummer, be behind perspex screens)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(drummer, have plexiglass around them)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(drummer, be behind perspex screens)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(drummer, be behind glass at glastonbury)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(drummer, be behind perspex screens)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(drummer, be behind plexiglass)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(drummer, be behind perspex screens)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(drummer, be behind plexiglass)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(drummer, be behind perspex screens)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(drummer, be behind glass)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(drummer, be behind perspex screens)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(drummer, be behind glass)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(drummer, be behind perspex screens)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(drummer, be behind plexiglass)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(drummer, be behind perspex screens)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(drummer, be behind glass at glastonbury)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(drummer, be behind perspex screens)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(drummer, have plexiglass around them)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(drummer, be behind perspex screens)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(drummer, be behind plexiglass)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(drummer, be behind perspex screens)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(drummer, be behind glass)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(drummer, be behind perspex screens)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(drummer, be behind glass)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(drummer, be behind perspex screens)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(drummer, have plexiglass around them)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(drummer, be behind perspex screens)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(drummer, have plexiglass around them)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(drummer, be behind perspex screens)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(drummer, be behind perspex screens)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(drummer, be behind perspex screens)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(drummer, be behind perspex screens)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(drummer, be behind perspex screens)