drunk driving: be against law

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents car accident
Weight: 0.69
, behavior
Weight: 0.68
, accident
Weight: 0.68
, crime
Weight: 0.68
, felony
Weight: 0.66
Siblings driving
Weight: 0.37
, vehicular accident
Weight: 0.35
, crash
Weight: 0.35
, plane crash
Weight: 0.35
, sexual assault
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be against law 1.00
relate to law 0.83
have statute 0.79
be against people 0.78
be against other people 0.77
be punishable by law 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(crime, be punishable by law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(drunk driving, be against law)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(crime, relate to law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(drunk driving, be against law)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(drunk driving, be against law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(crime, relate to law)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(drunk driving, be against law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(crime, be punishable by law)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, be against law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(crime, relate to law)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, be against law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(crime, be punishable by law)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, be against law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(driving, be against law)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(crime, be punishable by law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(drunk driving, be against law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(drunk driving, be against law)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(crime, relate to law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(drunk driving, be against law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(drunk driving, be against law)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(drunk driving, be against law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(driving, be against law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(driving, be against law)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(drunk driving, be against law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(drunk driving, be against law)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(drunk driving, be against law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(drunk driving, be against law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, be against law)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(drunk driving, be against law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(drunk driving, be against law)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, be against law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(crime, relate to law)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, be against law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(crime, be punishable by law)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, be against law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(driving, be against law)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(drunk driving, be against law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(crime, relate to law)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(drunk driving, be against law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(crime, be punishable by law)