drunk driving: become problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents car accident
Weight: 0.69
, behavior
Weight: 0.68
, accident
Weight: 0.68
, crime
Weight: 0.68
, felony
Weight: 0.66
Siblings driving
Weight: 0.37
, vehicular accident
Weight: 0.35
, crash
Weight: 0.35
, plane crash
Weight: 0.35
, sexual assault
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
become problem 1.00
be considered problem 0.91
has state problem 0.88
is suddenly problem 0.87
be considered social problem 0.85
fear of is problem 0.84
is social problem 0.84
be perceived as class problem 0.83
fear of is serious problem 0.82
be perceived as working class problem 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(car accident, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(drunk driving, become problem)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(crime, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(drunk driving, become problem)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(crime, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(drunk driving, become problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(drunk driving, become problem)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(crime, is social problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(drunk driving, become problem)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(crime, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(drunk driving, become problem)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(car accident, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, become problem)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(crime, has state problem)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, become problem)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(crime, is social problem)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, become problem)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(car accident, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, become problem)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(driving, become problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, become problem)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(driving, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, become problem)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, has state problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(car accident, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(drunk driving, become problem)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(drunk driving, become problem)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(crime, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(drunk driving, become problem)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(drunk driving, become problem)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(crime, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(drunk driving, become problem)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(drunk driving, become problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(drunk driving, become problem)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(driving, become problem)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(driving, become problem)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(drunk driving, become problem)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(sexual assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, has state problem)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(drunk driving, become problem)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(driving, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(driving, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(drunk driving, become problem)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(drunk driving, become problem)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(drunk driving, become problem)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(drunk driving, become problem)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, has state problem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(drunk driving, become problem)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(drunk driving, become problem)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(drunk driving, has state problem)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(drunk driving, become problem)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(drunk driving, become problem)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(drunk driving, has state problem)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(drunk driving, become problem)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(drunk driving, is suddenly problem)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(drunk driving, become problem)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(drunk driving, has state problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(drunk driving, become problem)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(drunk driving, become problem)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, become problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(drunk driving, become problem)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(drunk driving, become problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, become problem)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(crime, is social problem)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, become problem)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(car accident, has state problem)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, become problem)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(crime, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, become problem)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(driving, become problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, become problem)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sexual assault, has state problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(drunk driving, become problem)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(driving, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(drunk driving, become problem)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(crime, is social problem)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(drunk driving, become problem)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(car accident, has state problem)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(drunk driving, become problem)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(crime, has state problem)